CaseLawToday.com
Relevant Case Law, Every Day.
Supreme Court & High Courts Judgments
Firearm Injury--Incident had happened about 23 years back--Appellant had already undergone substantial period of sentence and thus reduced to period already undergone..
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Civil Suit for recovery can be filed by a firm, which is registered under the provisions of MSMED Act--Jurisdiction of Civil Court is not barred
Rejection of Plaint--Res judicata--Princ..
For the purpose of investigation, detaining a person overnight beyond earthly hours (over 30 hours in present case) for the purpose of questioning is violative of Article 21 of Constitution<..
Accused persons are practicing Advocates--Local lawyers are either reluctant or unwilling to accept a brief against fellow members of the Bar--Trial transferred to other District..
Grievous Hurt--Petitioner has been specifically named in the FIR under S.109 and S.117 BNS--Nature of the injuries attributed to him are serious and life-threatening, reflecting the severity..
Fraud with Bank--Accused sold the property mortgaged with bank having no lien in revenue records without paying the loan amount--This is serious and grave economic offence under S.316 and S...
Complainant has to be treated as Victim--Thus, appeal would lie before Sessions Court under proviso to S.372 CrPC/S.413 BNSS without leave to appeal by High Court..
Court while deciding application under O.6 R.17 CPC should not go into the correctness or falsity or the merits of the case in the amendment sought..
Bank cannot withhold the gratuity amount in case no financial loss has been caused to the Bank..
Time Barred Claim--Defendant had earlier filed false and frivolous suit in order to defame the plaintiff--Period of limitation of one year would begin from decision of earlier suit and not f..
Any report regarding existing construction and whether property is fit for habitation, would amount to collection of evidence in favour of a party--Application under O.26 R.9 CPC dismissed..
Registered Will challenged on contention that testator was of unsound mind--No evidence to prima facie establish the contention--O.39 R.1 and R.2 CPC application dismissed..
CaseLawToday.com is powered by M/s Law Herald Infotech