CaseLawToday.com
Relevant Case Law, Every Day.
Supreme Court & High Courts Judgments
Setting aside of--Murder was committed in gruesome manner--Thus, the fact that accused persons took victim to hospital cannot be ground to doubt intention to kill--Order granting bail set as..
Supreme Court
Neither the Suicide Note names the petitioner nor any other material attributes any direct threat made by the petitioner to the deceased--Accused discharged under S.227 CrPC/S.250 BNSS for t..
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Abuse of Official Position--Specific allegations supported by preliminary material--Anticipatory bail under the Corruption Act is to be granted only in the rarest of rare circumstances--Anti..
Testimony of important prosecution witness received on an affidavit--Defence has not raised any objection to this and has cross examined said witness--Thus, the violation of S.296 CrPC/S.332..
Setting aside of--Allegation of assault on the wife supported by wound certificate--Quashing by holding that the medical certificate was not consistent with the allegations--High Court had u..
Accused had been involved in cases triable by JMFC only--Present case is also triable by JMFC and not a heinous crime--Order granting anticipatory bail under S.438 CrPC/S.482 BNSS, upheld..
Petitioner attacked with Kirpan on nose--which reflects his intention--Grievous injuries are attributed to other accused--For offence under S.116 BNS, bail under S.482 BNSS granted..
Petitioner sold property by claiming himself as owner--No sale deed was executed--No buyer alleged that he was cheated--Anticipatory Bail under S.420 IPC/S.318 BNS granted..
Grant of sanction under S.197 CrPC/S.218 BNSS cannot be faulted merely on the ground of absence of addition of words to/deletion of words from the draft order placed before the sanctioning a..
Promise to Send Abroad--Petitioner is the wife of main accused who had received the part payment--She has been roped in only because she is the wife of the main accused--Anticipatory Bail un..
No minimum punishment has been prescribed for offence under S.61(1)(a) of Excise Act--Petitioner has suffered agony of trial for last 20 years--Sentence reduced to period already undergone..
Role of Petitioner is that said amount was received in his account and was further transferred--Petitioner is student of B-Tech--Further pre trial custody is not justified at this stage--Bai..
CaseLawToday.com is powered by M/s Law Herald Infotech